Female, why did you cite research on pre-historic people, when you know full well that the work required to build and maintain 'civilisation' is entirely different?

Pre-historic women did not haul millions of tons of stones across hundreds of miles of deserts, mountains, rivers and mud to build pyramids, massive castles, cathedrals or cities - did they? They did not crawl into mines to dig up minerals, then carry them hundreds of miles away - did they? They did not fell trees so massive it would take weeks to cut, move or burn them - did they? Pre-historic women did not do that kind of work and neither did pre-historic men. Just as your cited article makes clear, the lives of pre-historic men and women depended on the physical strength that we only see among athletes today. Their survival depended on their ability to walk and run long distances, jump, and remain agile.

Women today have very little in common with pre-historic women.

If you feel the need to use pre-historic women to support feminism, your views are nothing more than silly, schoolgirl fantasies. Before you speak for women, I suggest you develop a solid foundation and a clear understanding of the responsibilities and work that your vision will entail. What are you personally willing to do, to get what you want - for women?